Global Warming and Scientific Warning

 

Global Warming and Scientific Warning

-DR. ABDUL RUFF COALCHAL

____________

 

 

If the world powers are bent upon destroying the world and all living beings along with it, it seems, nothing can stop them. They can achieve the devastating objective but would not be existing to recount the tragedies impact on them.

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) synthesis report on the global scientific community’s assessment of human-caused global warming offers the starkest and most strongly-worded warning yet of the dangers ahead for the earth and humanity.

Aspects of future climate shifts are probably already irreversible but, however, Climate change will be significantly more dangerous, deadly, and expensive if nothing is done to correct humanity’s course

Climate change is the most important environmental threat at par with nuclear weapons. Climate change is real and around us. The IPCC assessment seeks to tie together previous reports the panel has released over the last year and offers a stark assessment of the perilous future the planet and humanity face due to global warming and climate change.

The world’s leading scientists have reached a clear and overwhelming consensus that the failure to adequately acknowledge and act on previous warnings has put the planet on a path where “severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts” of human-caused climate change will surely be felt in the decades to come. Pennsylvania State University climate scientist Michael Mann wrote: “The report tells us once again what we know with a greater degree of certainty: that climate change is real, it is caused by us, and it is already causing substantial damage to us and our environment. If there is one take home point of this report it is this: We have to act now.”

Using blunter, more forceful language than the reports that underpin it, the new draft highlights the urgency of the risks that are likely to be intensified by continued emissions of heat-trapping gases, primarily carbon dioxide released by the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas.

It cited rising political efforts around the world on climate change, including efforts to limit emissions as well as to adapt to changes that have become inevitable. But the report found that these efforts were being overwhelmed by construction of facilities like new coal-burning power plants that will lock in high emissions for decades.

From 1970 to 2000, global emissions of greenhouse gases grew at 1.3 percent a year. But from 2000 to 2010, that rate jumped to 2.2 percent a year, the report found, and the pace seems to be accelerating further in this decade.

 

Continued emission of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and long-lasting changes in all components of the climate system, increasing the likelihood of severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts for people and ecosystems The IPCC draft paints a harsh warning of what’s causing global warming and what it will do to humans and the environment. It also describes what can be done about it.

The IPCC report  is designed to integrate the findings of the three working group contributions to the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report and two special reports” and provide policymakers with a scientific foundation to tackle the challenge of climate change. Taken together, the IPCC reports and their recommendations are designed to help governments and other stakeholders work together at various levels, including a new international agreement to limit climate change.

It mentions extreme weather and rising sea levels, such as heat waves, flooding and droughts. It even raises, as an earlier report did, the idea that climate change will worsen violent conflicts and refugee problems and could hinder efforts to grow more food. And ocean acidification, which comes from the added carbon absorbed by oceans, will harm marine life, it says.

Without changes in greenhouse gas emissions, “climate change risks are likely to be high or very high by the end of the 21st century

 

The risk of abrupt and irreversible change increases as the magnitude of the warming increases. The draft includes not new information per se, but employs stronger language and contains a more urgent warning than the previous reports from the IPCC which it attempts to synthesize and summarize.

The report found that companies and governments had identified reserves of these fuels at least four times larger than could safely be burned if global warming is to be kept to a tolerable level. That means if society wants to limit the risks to future generations, it must find the discipline to leave a vast majority of these valuable fuels in the ground

The final report, rather final warning will be issued after governments and scientists go over the draft line by line in an October conference in Copenhagen late October. In September, the United Nations is hosting its next international climate summit in New York City and climate campaigners are hoping to capitalize on the meeting by planning what they are calling the “People’s Climate March” during the same week as a way to apply pressure on world governments to finally act on the issue.

Politicians have come together too many times with nothing more than rhetoric and empty promises in tow. Next month, thousands of true leaders will be marching on the streets of New York demanding real action. The question is, will our elected leaders follow.

The IPCC draft report should serve to galvanize and add weight to the climate justice movement, which has consistently demanded that world leaders respond to the crisis with action—not words.

Save climate!

Save world!

Save humanity!

Russia meets Ukraine amid standoff!

Russia meets Ukraine amid standoff!

-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

__________________

 

 

 

After all there were together fighting the enemy of socialism during the cold war and have some basic understating about their problems and the can find solutions. Russia and Ukraine were part of Russia for centuries and separated as the mighty Soviet state crumpled and dissolved into 15 independent republics.

 

Splitting the Soviet Union had been one of the major agenda of US led NATO>and they did succeed in making the Soviet system crimple.

 

 

Conflict

 

 

The post-Crimea military tension in Ukraine shows no signs of abating. The United Nations Human Rights Committee concluded that separatists and Ukrainian forces have both committed an array of abuses. According to the findings the rebels have engaged in murder, torture and abductions that were “disproportionately targeting civilians”. They receive a steady supply of sophisticated weapons and ammunition from Russia. Violations by the Ukrainian military and Interior Ministry special battalions include “arbitrary detention, enforced disappearances and torture. Most of the fighting, which has cost at least 2,000 lives, has been concentrated in Ukraine’s industrialized Donbass region and the key rebel strongholds of Donetsk and Luhansk, which separatists have declared as independent states.

 

The fighting in eastern Ukraine began in mid-April, a month after Russia annexed Crimea. It has killed over 2,000 people and forced over 340,000 to flee, according to the U.N. Russian Defense Ministry as saying the soldiers were patrolling the border and probably crossed the border inadvertently. Russia reportedly has tens of thousands of troops positioned in areas near the Ukrainian border, leading to persistent concerns that Moscow could be preparing an invasion.

 

Putin has so far ignored requests from the rebels to be annexed by Russia — unlike in March, when he annexed Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula. But Associated Press journalists on the border have seen the rebels with a wide range of unmarked military equipment — including tanks, Buk missile launchers and armored personnel carriers — and have run into many Russians among the rebel fighters. It was the second straight day that attacks were reported in the vicinity of Novoazovsk, which is in eastern Ukraine’s separatist Donetsk region but previously had seen little fighting. Novoazovsk lies on the Azov Sea on the road that runs from Russia to the major Ukrainian port of Mariupol and west to Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula annexed by Russia.

 

Now after the war conflict in east Ukraine, when the leaders of Russian Ukraine met an impression was  created that  they want to sort out differences. Even as tensions have ramped up after Russia for the first time admitted that its troops had crossed onto Ukrainian soil after Kiev released footage purporting to show 10 Russian soldiers captured on its territory, the presidents of Russia and Ukraine (Vladimir Putin and Petro Poroshenko) shook hands ahead of key talks in Minsk on 26 August, though with little hope for a breakthrough to end the raging conflict pitting Kiev against pro-Moscow separatist rebels..

The soldiers from a Russian paratrooper division were captured around Amvrosiivka, a town near the Russian border. Towering columns of smoke rose Tuesday from outside a city in Ukraine’s far southeast after what residents said was a heavy artillery barrage. Ukraine accused separatists and their Russian backers of trying to expand the conflict. It was the second straight day that attacks were reported in the vicinity of Novoazovsk, which is in eastern Ukraine’s separatist Donetsk region but previously had seen little fighting.

 

Ukraine’s forces accused Russian troops of trying to open a “new front” after an armoured convoy crossed onto government-held territory Monday in the south of Donetsk region. Ukrainian officials said artillery was fired from the Russian side of the border. A Ukrainian soldier who declined to give his name suggested that the shelling could have come from rebels aiming to take out a Ukrainian rocket launcher. In Kiev, Col. Andriy Lysenko blamed the shelling on “Russian mercenaries.” Novoazovsk lies on the Azov Sea on the road that runs from Russia to the major Ukrainian port of Mariupol. That same road goes west to Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula annexed by Russia in March.

 

Ukraine also accused Russian army helicopters of launching a ferocious missile attack on a Ukrainian border position further to the north, killing four border guards and bringing the death toll to 12 soldiers in the past 24 hours. Local authorities in the main rebel bastion of Donetsk said three civilians were killed in shelling overnight as the army pummels insurgent fighters.

The rebels previously announced the launch of a counter-offensive after losing swathes of territory to a push by government forces. Officials from the EU and Russian-led Customs Union were set to discuss the crisis and trade issues after Ukraine’s new pro-Western leaders signed a landmark deal with the European Union in June that riled Russia.

Russia unilaterally sent about 230 lorries carrying what it claimed was 1,800 tonnes of humanitarian aid to the rebel-held city of Lugansk on Friday after accusing Kiev of intentionally delaying the mission. Kiev condemned the move as a “direct invasion”. Some 400,000 people have fled their homes since April in fighting that has left residents in some besieged rebel-held cities without water or power for weeks.

Ukraine said a small column of Russian tanks and armored vehicles crossed into Ukraine north of Novoazovsk, raising the possibility that pro-Russia separatists were aiming to take control of a strip of land that would link up Russia with Crimea. “Russia is trying from its side to open a new front. The new columns of Russian tanks and armor crossing into Ukraine indicates a Russian-directed counteroffensive may be underway,” U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt said there were enough forces and equipment in Mariupol to defend the city of more than 450,000. An AP reporter saw excavators digging deep trenches on the eastern edge of the city.

Ukrainian media aired footage purporting to show captured Russian soldiers confessing to crossing into Ukraine in armoured convoys.  Kiev has long accused Moscow of stoking the separatist insurgency raging in its east — charges the Kremlin has repeatedly denied — but this is the first time it has claimed to have captured Russian soldiers on Ukrainian soil.”Officially, they are at exercises in various corners of Russia. In reality, they are participating in military aggression against Ukraine”, Defence Minister Valeriy Geletey said  A Russian defence ministry source on Tuesday said the captured soldiers had crossed into Ukraine accidentally. The soldiers had been “taking part in patrolling a section of the Russian-Ukrainian border. They crossed it most likely by accident, on an unequipped, unmarked section”.

 

 

Meeting

 

 

The presidents of Russia and Ukraine met face-to-face on 26th August for the first time since June to talk about the fighting that has engulfed Ukraine’s separatist east. From their opening remarks, it appeared unlikely that Vladimir Putin and Petro Poroshenko would find common ground. Meanwhile, a Moscow military source claimed they had crossed into Ukraine “by accident”. Pressure soared after Kiev’s security service said that paratroopers from Russia’s 98th airborne division had been captured by Ukrainian forces about 50 kilometres (30 miles) southeast of the main rebel stronghold of Donetsk.

The two leaders sat on opposite sides of a large round table and were joined by the presidents of Belarus and Kazakhstan and three senior officials from the European Union. Contrary to some expectations, they did not meet one-on-one ahead of the talks. They did stage a handshake for the cameras.

The presidents of Russia and Ukraine who arrived to attend a conference in the Belarusian capital about the development of the Eurasian Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan, representatives of the European Commission and the Russian Federation, met face-to-face for the first time since June on the fighting that has engulfed Ukraine’s separatist east. They were joined by the presidents of Belarus and Kazakhstan and three senior officials from the European Union in the Belarusian capital of Minsk.

The meeting came as Ukraine said its forces had captured 10 Russian soldiers in eastern Ukraine and the shelling spread to a new front in the far southeast. Ukraine has repeatedly accused Russia of supporting and arming the rebels, which Russia denies daily. “The fate of peace and the fate of Europe are being decided in Minsk today,” Poroshenko said as the talks began.

The leaders spent two hours discussing bilateral concerns after a regional economic summit in Minsk, Belarus, in which Putin said there is no military solution to the crisis in Ukraine. It was their first formal meeting since a chilly encounter in June during D-Day commemorations in Normandy, France.  Poroshenko said in a statement afterward that a “road map” for a possible cease-fire in eastern Ukraine would be prepared as soon as possible. He and Putin agreed to begin consultations about border guards.

The meeting in the Belarusian capital of Minsk came as Ukraine said it had captured 10 Russian soldiers in eastern Ukraine and shelling spread to a new front in the country’s southeast. Ukraine has repeatedly accused Russia of supporting and arming the pro-Russian rebels fighting government troops, which Russia always denies. “The fate of peace and the fate of Europe are being decided in Minsk today,” Poroshenko, a billionaire chocolate magnate, said as the talks began, his manner unusually restrained. Poroshenko told the gathering in Minsk that “the fate of the world and Europe” is being decided there. 10 soldiers from a Russian paratrooper division were captured Monday in the area of Amvrosiivka, near the Russian border in the Donetsk region. Russian Defense Ministry said that the servicemen were patrolling the Russian-Ukrainian border area and probably crossed the border by accident. Ukraine rejected any claims of an accident.

Putin devoted most of his opening remarks to trade, arguing that Ukraine’s decision to sign an association agreement with the 28-nation EU would lead to huge losses for Russia, which would then be forced to protect its economy. Russia had been counting on Ukraine joining a rival economic union it is forming with Belarus and Kazakhstan. Ukraine is set to ratify the EU association agreement in September. On the fighting, Putin said he was certain the conflict “could not be solved by further escalation of the military scenario without taking into account the vital interests of the southeast of the country and without a peaceful dialogue of its representatives.”

 

Poroshenko said the purpose of his visit was to start searching for a political compromise and promised that the interests of Russian-speakers in eastern Ukraine would be taken into account. Ukraine wants the rebels to hand back the territory they have captured in eastern Ukraine, while Putin wants to retain some sort of leverage over the mostly Russian-speaking region so Ukraine does not join NATO or the European Union.

 

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko urged both sides to “discard political ambitions and not to seek political dividend.”

 

No compromise

The refusal by Kiev’s former president Viktor Yanukovych to ink the EU deal last year in favour of Moscow’s economic bloc sparked the protests that eventually led to his ouster and sparked a chain of events that saw Russia annex Ukraine’s Crimea region and sparked the pro-Moscow insurgency.

 

On the ground there appeared no end in sight to the four months of conflict that has already claimed some 2,200 lives and has plunged relations between Russia and the West to levels not seen since the end of the Cold War in 1991.

 

Ukraine wants the rebels to hand back the territory they have captured in eastern Ukraine, while Putin wants to retain some sort of leverage over the mostly Russian-speaking region so Ukraine does not join NATO or the European Union.

 

Petro Poroshenko and Vladimir Putin met in Belarus with top EU officials and the leaders of Kazakhstan and Belarus in a bid to defuse the conflict some fear could trigger all-out war between Kiev and its former Soviet master Moscow. Poroshenko told Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko that “peace is the priority” ahead of the group meeting.

Putin called their discussions “positive” and said Russia would do everything it could to help achieve peace between Kiev and pro-Moscow separatists in eastern Ukraine. He said a cease-fire was never discussed with Poroshenko. Putin devoted most of his opening remarks to trade, arguing that Ukraine’s decision to sign an association agreement with the EU would lead to huge losses for Russia, which would then be forced to protect its economy.

 

Putin has so far ignored requests from the rebels to be annexed by Russia — unlike in March, when he annexed Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula. But the rebels are seen with a wide range of unmarked military equipment — including tanks, Buk missile launchers and armored personnel carriers — and have run into many Russians among the rebel fighters.

 

 

Russia had been counting on Ukraine joining a rival economic union that it is forming with Belarus and Kazakhstan. Ukraine is set to ratify the EU association agreement in September. On the fighting, Putin said he was certain the conflict could not be solved by further escalation of the military scenario without taking into account the vital interests of the southeast of the country and without a peaceful dialogue of its representatives.

 

Ukraine said a small column of Russian tanks and armored vehicles crossed into Ukraine north of Novoazovsk, raising the possibility that pro-Russia separatists were aiming to take control of a strip of land that would link up Russia with Crimea. Ukraine accused the separatists and Russia of trying to expand the conflict. Towering columns of smoke rose from outside a city in Ukraine’s far southeast after what residents said was a heavy artillery barrage.

 

Poroshenko would be unlikely to agree to Russia’s frequent call for federalization — devolving wide powers to the regions from the central government — but could agree to allow them to have some expanded powers. He also has spoken against holding a referendum on Ukraine’s joining NATO; Russia’s desire to keep Ukraine out of the military alliance is seen as one of Moscow’s key concerns.

 

Moscow also said it seeks a negotiated settlement and not a military victory. Poroshenko would be unlikely to agree to Russia’s frequent call for Ukraine to federalize — devolving wide powers to the regions from the central government in Kiev — but could agree to give the regions some expanded powers. Poroshenko also has spoken against holding a referendum on Ukraine’s joining NATO.

 

Meanwhile, Washington claims Russian-directed counteroffensive may be underway and Russia is trying from its side to open a new front. Russia reportedly has tens of thousands of troops positioned in areas near the Ukrainian border, leading to persistent concerns that Moscow could be preparing an invasion. Ukrainian officials said artillery in the region was fired from the Russian side of the border. Later in the day, reporters saw Ukrainian troops and equipment moving on the road west of Novoazovsk, and heard the rumbling of what sounded like artillery fire in the distance.

As Ukraine’s political transition continues, Poroshenko announced long-awaited early parliamentary elections for October 26. The Kremlin also ratcheted up the pressure by announcing plans to send another aid convoy into eastern Ukraine “this week”.

 

 

Of course, there wasn’t any peace talk between Putin and Poroshenko and hence real peace in Ukraine is far away. .

 

 

Kashmir and Denuclearization: India versus Pakistan or together?

Kashmir and Denuclearization: India versus Pakistan or together?

-DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL

____________________________

(Draft)

 

There is one thing common between India and Pakistan: both as nuclear powers appreciate praises and hate any criticism.

Clearly it not just the Kashmir issue that makes them vulnerable to illogical assertions about military postures.

But more than that,  their nuclear arsenals  that have given them special terror status along with other  nuke giants in the world, like  all powerful USA, Russia, China, Germany, Briton, France, among others, including those  that still refuse to admit their  stolen nukes, like Israel.

In fact, it is their nuclear status that has given “honorable” position to India and Pakistan where  most people are poor and starving for  food, clothing and shelter, among big powers, and both consider this as great prestige.

While Palestine in West Asia is burning with the a series of Israeli terror attacks on Gaza strip to effect holocaust of Palestinians in a step by step and quick phased manner, in down South Asia, Kashmiri Muslims seeking sovereignty back from occupation forces of India, Pakistan and China – thousands of Muslims also have lost their valuable lives in these parts of Asia and face similar existential predicament due to illegal, brutal occupational methods of colonialism.

Just like in Mideast where Israel and Palestine prolong talks and mutual attacks, India and Pakistan also deliberately prolong the occupation by military -media tactics.

It appears both India and Pakistan play a joint political game with Kashmiris since they jointly occupy major pats of Jammu Kashmir. While Indian regime and media blame Pakistan and its military for failures in talks and deficit of trust between them, Pakistan blames India and ultra fanatic media and thus both continue the mutually blaming game.

And, like on Palestine, on Kashmir also the UN and Security Council have not take any worthwhile position, thereby leaving the explosive issues to the mercy of global dictator USA and regional military powers to decide.

The role and relevance of UN and UNSC have been denied by the world which remains the target of colonialist imperialist forces like NATO.

All these years the freedom groups Hurriyat have demanded to include representatives of Hurriyat in Indo-Pak talks, but India turned down that plea, saying that Kashmiri representatives are not needed as India represents Kashmiris as well.

A readymade answer and a big full stop!

Recently, India has called off the foreign secretary level talks with Pakistan talks between Indian foreign secretary Sujatha Singh and her Pakistani counterpart AA Chowdhury after the latter’s envoy in New Delhi Abdul Basit had invited Kashmiri separatists to the talks.   In doing so, Indian government has given a clear message to Pakistan, stating that they must engage with the official government and not “separatists”

Separatist leaders Syed Ali Shah Geelani and Yasin Malik met Pakistan high commissioner Abdul Basit in Delhi on August 19 triggering protests in New Delhi.  Angered by the meeting, people protested outside the Pakistan high commission in New Delhi with some protesters being detained. Clashes were also reported between the police and protesters outside the high commission. The protesters want the Pakistan high commissioner to be sent back.   Syed Ali Shah Geelani said that Kashmir is an international issue and not an internal issue of India. He said India is not trying to resolve the issue and suppressing it.

When India cancelled the talks between Foreign Secretaries in Islamabad on August 25, telling Pakistan bluntly to choose between an Indo-Pak dialogue or hobnobbing with the separatists, Pakistani regime just took it casually as it knows India is also not eager to return sovereignty to Kashmiris

And both want the dialogue cannot go on for another very important reason.

India and Pakistan obtained nuclear arms thanks to Jammu Kashmir which occupy jointly along with China. Both don’t want to lose nukes

India strongly objected to consultations Pakistan High Commissioner Abdul Basit had with separatist Hurriyat leaders from Indi occupied Kashmir. .

Yes, not only Pakistan but some Indian leaders, like senior CPI (M) leader Sitaram Yechury criticized the government for calling off the Indo-Pak talks after Kashmiri separatists met Pakistan High Commissioner, saying the decision was “inexplicable” as these meetings could be held only after the authorities permitted them.  “Whenever some Pakistani leaders come, the separatists meet them and they do so in our country itself.  And this is not possible without the permission of our government”

Why did it permit the meeting first? And after giving the permission, to call off the (Indo-Pak) talks is inexplicable. It can’t be understood.

In order to show anger, the Indian government called off the August 25 foreign secretary-level talks, calling Pakistan’s engagement with the Kashmiri separatists unacceptable. India slammed it as continued efforts to interfere in its internal affairs.  A day after India cancelled Foreign Secretary-level talks over Pakistani envoy’s meeting with Kashmiri separatists, Pakistan reacted strongly saying it was “not subservient” to New Delhi and was a “legitimate stakeholder” in the Kashmir dispute.   Arguing that High Commissioner Abdul Basit did not interfere in India’s internal affairs, Pakistan Foreign Office spokesperson Tasnim Aslam claimed that Kashmir was not part of India.  “That is just a pretext. It was not the first time that meetings with Hurriyat leaders took place. It is been happening for decades, the High Commissioner of Pakistan did not interfere in India’s internal affairs. Pakistan is not subservient to India. It is a sovereign country, a legitimate stakeholder in the Jammu and Kashmir dispute,” she said replying to Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh telling Basit to not to go ahead with the meeting in New Delhi and to choose between dialogue with India or with the Kashmiri separatists.  Aslam, who has previously served in India, asserted that “Kashmir is not part of India”. “It is a disputed territory. There are numerous UN resolutions,” she said.

As a usual; gimmick, India cancelled the talks, raising strong objections to consultations held with separatist Hurriyat leaders by Pakistan’s High Commissioner.  Pakistan also criticized India as a usual tactic. In exercising its diplomatic rhetoric, Pakistan had described the cancellation of next week’s Foreign Secretary-level talks as a “setback” to Indo-Pak ties.

Pakistan cannot bluntly to choose between an Indo-Pak dialogue and hobnobbing with the separatists.

Both India and Pakistan do not want to  go denuclear by dismantling all nuke arsenal that they have managed to build up for decades of their  mutual animosity and by misusing the resources meant for  utility by the people, especially common people.

Interestingly, by agreeing for credible friendship and mutual trust based relations, these South Asian nations will have to agree to US controlled IAEA to dismantle the nuclear  installations- a situation both Indi and Pakistan do  not  want.

Already USA has asked India and Pakistan to  quit nuclear regimes to make South Asia a peace zone.  but they refuse.

 

While it could not send military to Indian soil to make entire India a safe haven for NATO terrorist gangs like in Pakistan, USA has been trying to steal, like Libyan oil, all Pakistani nukes by prolonging NATO- Pakistani war targeting Muslims for clearing energy routes to benefit the prospective customers, and fueling the civil war but have so far failed.

With a peaceful atmosphere in the region USA would push for denuclearization of entire world minus the veto powers.

In order to escape the situation and seeing nukes as its prerogative, New Delhi has been pestering all western powers to make it also a veto power. India thinks if can get the support of many countries it can enter the veto regime comfortably. However, Americans have their own ideas to sustain its superpower status with the terror veto. .

Yes, it is high time Pakistan should step in to break the ice by declaring its intention to  arrange for the peaceful transfer of  power of Azad Kashmir to Kashmiris on both sides if India  agrees to  quit military occupation of Jammu Kashmir, enabling  the Kashmiris in JK to rejoin their  brethren in Azad Kashmir on northern  border.

 

Also, China should also make similar declaration of returning to Kashmiris the part of Kashmir now under their occupation. Musharraf had no authority to hand over a part of Kashmir in Azad Kashmir to China as a friendly gesture in return for the China favors or for any other reason

 

That is to say there should a credibly comprehensive solution for the Kashmir issue. All three parts of earlier Kashmir should be brought together and returned to Kashmiris.

 

It is now clear, unless India as well as Pakistan get rid of their nukes, there is no chance for regional peace, no chance for the resolution of Kashmir issue.

Denuclearizaton would eventually lead to demilitarization of Kashmir as well. Conversely, demilitarization of Kashmir valley could also lead to denuclearize the region.

It is strange that while India and Pakistan r continue to work to retain their dangerous nuclear arsenals by sustaining the illegal occupation of the then neighboring Jammu Kashmir jointly, the Kashmiris do not seem to know that truth. Of course, those Kashmiris who know or have an idea of the hidden nuclear problem also do not open their mouths to fellow Kashmiris.

And those Kashmir Muslims who sacrifice their valuable lives for freedom should have the right to know the nuclear truth.

In other words, neither India nor Pakistan would return the Kashmiri lands to Kashmiris unless less their nuclear arsenals are destroyed or taken away the international nuclear watch dog. Both have set up the necessary additional “safeguards” to prolong the occupation and related crimes. For India, the pundits act as a powerful force to support Indian case, while Pakistan has got many Kashmiris of Azad Kashmir to side the official occupation.

Both India and Israel claim ownership of Kashmiris and Palestinians, respectively,  and kill them to quell their freedom movements and silence them.

Since bilateral talks have yielded any fruits so far, it is better India and Pakistan agrees to include a couple of Kashmiri representatives in their talks hereafter so that they could thrash out the illegal occupation issue once for all.

Kashmiris are also humans deserving dignity and they should be allowed to live in peace.

One gets the impression that there are more security forces and allies than Kashmiris in occupied Kashmir with special law for military brutalities.

Time is over due to establish a special international court to exclusively decide the freedom related issues, including genocides, destructions, and war crimes!

_______________

Observation: Let them now try trilateral talks

___________

 

Pakistan High Commissioner in India Abdul Basit went ahead and met Hurriyat leaders despite being specifically asked by New Delhi not to do so.  In order to show its unhappiness, India unilaterally called off the bilateral talks. The Ministry of External Affairs in New Delhi had this angry response to Pakistan envoy’s actions: “At a time when serious initiatives were being undertaken by the Government of India to move bilateral ties forward, including towards the resumption of a regular dialogue process, the invitation to so-called leaders of the Hurriyat by Pakistan’s High Commissioner does indeed raise questions about Pakistan’s sincerity, and shows that its negative approaches and attempts to interfere in India’s internal affairs continue unabated.

Indian foreign secretary conveyed to the Pakistan High Commissioner in clear and unambiguous terms that Pakistan’s continued efforts to interfere in India’s internal affairs were unacceptable.  Singh had told Basit over the phone that Pakistan needs either to engage with the Indian government or with the Hurriyat, failing which consequences would follow and it followed.

Emphasizing on the need for effective dialogue to find peaceful solutions to the problems, Pakistan High Commissioner Abdul Basit said that they stand committed to improving ties with India and he did not breach any protocol by holding talks with Kashmiri separatist leaders. . “We have good neighborly relations with India. We are convinced in Pakistan that problems with India can only be resolved through peace process and meaningful dialogue” Basit said, Kashmiris are legitimate stakeholders in finding a peaceful solution to the issue. We have been reaching out to Kashmiri leaders for the last 20 years. Kashmir is a dispute which needs to be resolved peacefully, both countries committed to resolving it. While his move to meet Jammu and Kashmir separatist leaders has drawn immense criticism, the Pakistan envoy defended the meeting. ” Basit also said that he was disappointed that the Foreign Secretary-level talks have been cancelled but added it should not discourage the two countries to find a peaceful solution to the the Kashmir issue. “We understand it is a complex situation. We in Pakistan are very positive and will not allow distractions in normalising ties,” he said.

 

India had called off the talks between Foreign Secretaries, telling Pakistan bluntly to choose between an Indo-Pak dialogue or hobnobbing with the separatists.

The Kashmiri separatists for freedom are themselves unfazed by the talks being called off. Hurriyat leader Syed Ali Geelani said: “Despite this development, we will go to New Delhi and meet the Pakistan high commissioner.” He added that India doesn’t want peaceful solution to the Kashmir issue. The moderate Hurriyat chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq too slammed Delhi over the decision and he too will be meeting the Pakistan envoy today and said that they will put forth their view on Kashmir. They met the Pakistani high commissioner as scheduled. Jammu and Kashmir’s ruling National Conference meanwhile termed the decision to call off the talks “strange” while the opposition Peoples Democratic Party called it “a negative development”.  Kashmiri separatist leader Shabir Shah who had met Pakistan envoy Abdul Basit told reporters after his meeting that there was need for trilateral talks to resolve Kashmir issue

 

Noting that Pakistan wants to improve ties with India, he said there was no need to be “pessimistic” about cancellation of the Foreign Secretary-level talks and that both the countries should move forward. So the setback should not disappoint us, discourage us to finding ways and means as to how to take the process forward in line with our leadership’s visions on both sides of the border. So we will try our maximum to see as to how this process can be taken forward,” Basit said. He said Pakistan understands that it was a “complex situation” but added it was positive and will not allow distractions to come in the way of finding solutions to the problems.

 

It is a fact that Kashmiris in Sri Nagar who fight for freedom from India yoke don’t say thing about  Jammu and Leh regions a maybe because these regions  have  lots of  Hindus ad  Buddhists, respectively and Kashmiris perhaps  want to establish an Islamic republic .

While underlining that Pakistan had termed the cancellation of talks as a “setback”, the envoy stressed that the time has come for the two countries to move from confrontation to co-operation. Pakistan stands by its commitment to peace and attaches enormous importance to peaceful bilateral relationship, he added. “We are convinced that our problems with India can only be resolved by result-oriented and meaningful dialogue,” Basit said further.

Recalling Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s comment that SAARC countries needed to work together in tackling regional challenges, Basit said if Pakistan and India work together and if SAARC is vitalised, the  sky is the limit.” Commenting further on the peace dialogue, Basit stressed that there is no reason why we should lose hope on building a strong bilateral relationship. “We would not allow this process to be distracted,  Dialogue is not a favour by Pakistan to India or vice-versa. Both countries need to work together,” the envoy stated.

The envoy, meanwhile, informed that no meeting has been finalised between PM Modi and his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif in New York next month.

True, Kashmiris are legitimate stakeholders in peaceful and viable resolution of the problem. But are Indi and Pakistan serious?

____________

India plans for Narendra Modi-Barrack Obama meeting in Washington!

 

 

India plans for Narendra Modi-Barrack Obama meeting in Washington!

-DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL 

_______________

 

According to reports available in the corridors of Indian power, India’s newly sworn in Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who swept to power in a general election last month, will visit Washington to meet President Barack Obama in the last week of September. During his telephonic conversation with Obama, Modi has accepted an invitation from Obama for two-way talks in Washington. Obama had invited Modi to the USA when he called up the PM to congratulate him.

 

Premier Modi is scheduled to attend a UN general assembly meeting as Indian PM in September. The Obama –Modi meeting is being arranged  on the sidelines of the UN meeting. Obama’s meeting with Modi signals a new start in ties with a leader once denied a visa by the United States.

Both countries are keen to boost security and economic ties as. India seeks to reinvigorate its ties with USA while not spoiling its traditional military relations with Russia.

As it is known, the Obama administration, seeking more finances from India to back up US economic meltdown, has set a goal of quintupling annual trade with India to $500 billion. But India’s economy is widely seen as having stagnated throughout the final years of Modi’s predecessor, Manmohan Singh. With a nominal GDP of $1.85 trillion in 2013, according to the IMF, India is only the world’s tenth-largest economy, despite being the world’s second most populous. India’s GDP growth has since stalled, falling to just 4.4% in 2013.

 

India has also been blighted by rising levels of corruption, unemployment and inflation in recent times, with the rupee weakening against the US dollar (it has rebounded to 59 to the dollar since Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) party won the election).  In August 2013, Singh’s administration was forced to introduce limited capital controls to prevent the collapse of the rupee and avert a balance of payments crisis. Generally, his government had come to be seen as one that seemed to have run out of ideas.

It was therefore no surprise that the weakness of the Indian economy and poor governance resulting in rampant corruption, rising prices and unemployment and black money and black markets, etc, were the key themes of the election campaign.

Following his stunning election victory last week, India’s new Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, is determined to inject some dynamism into the country’s economy. Seen as a neoliberal, Modi has set his sights on removing inefficiencies, tackling corruption and rolling out free-market policies that can weaken the already shaken poor of India. The flip side will be curbing welfare programs, as per the IMP plans as it is happening in Europe, making common people extremely vulnerable to price shocks.

 

Modi wants to cautiously open up the Indian economy to foreign investment to boost growth and job creation and ahs already announced a full 100% foreign investment in military goods production in India. His government may announce as soon as next month that it will allow foreign online retailers to sell their own products in India, creating a major business opportunity for big transnational players such as Amazon. 

There are also concerns that Modi, who downplayed his Hindu nationalism during the campaign, may end up fanning the flames of religious hatred in India.  In 2002, soon after he became Gujarat’s chief minister, he condoned the massacre of 1,000 Muslims in the anti-Muslim riots of that year. Modi denied complicity and was cleared of wrongdoing by several inquiries but was banned from entering the US (a ban that the administration of President Barack Obama’s lifted when Modi won the election). However, there is a risk that India’s relations with Muslim countries including Pakistan could become more strained, especially if there are any repeats of the 2002 episode.

 

In taking the decision, Modi has acted with alacrity and decisiveness on what many believe is going to be one of the biggest immediate challenges for India’s foreign policy. Modi regime is eager to take steps for mending India-US ties which had tapered off under UPA. Modi’s decision underlines the significance of the US in India’s strategic matrix. There was speculation that Modi could focus more on China and South Korea for economic gains and on an improved security partnership with Japan but these are not likely to come at the expense of Washington.

 

Modi, a former chief minister of Gujarat, had been refused a U.S. visa over sectarian strife in the state in 2002, in which more than 1,000 people, mainly Muslims, were killed. He has denied any wrongdoing and an Indian Supreme Court inquiry found no case to answer. The US ambassador to India met Modi earlier this year, as opinion polls showed his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on course for an election victory. U.S. officials had said a visa and an invitation to meet would probably be forthcoming if Modi won.

 

Can Modi banish unemployment and instill some dynamism back into the economy? Goals of BJP include creating the 10 million new jobs that India needs every year just to absorb young people entering the workforce. It was a positive economic vision which captured the imagination of people.

Modi government wants to see the Modi-Obama summit as one of the foremost international events of the year overshadowing even Modi’s presence at UNGA, if he decides to go to New York too.

Significantly, according to Indian sources, the meeting won’t happen on the sidelines of the United Nations general assembly in New York but, as per Indian request, in the form of a full-fledged bilateral summit in Washington.

The two sides are finalizing the date for the meeting which will be in the last week of September.  Scheduling of Modi visit has still to be finalized, but the summit would represent an upgrade from earlier expectations that Modi would meet Obama on the sidelines of the annual United Nations general assembly in New York.

However, no comment was immediately available from the Indian government press office or from the US embassy about the Modi visit to USA.

 

 

د. عبد راف 

Unfortunately, today there is not even one Muslim nation practicing  truly Islamic faith and life. 

–BY DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL has been an Educationist, Prolific writer, Commentator  on world affairs Expert on Mideast Affairs,  Former university Teacher;  Editor:INTERNATIONAL OPINION; FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES; Author of books;

Dr. Abdul Ruff has published his views globally in  hundreds of   printed as well as online newspapers. including, International Herald Tribune, Global politician,  The Canadian, Turkish Digest, Financial Tines,Frontier Post, Arab News, Al-Jazeera, Economic Weekly, Friday Weekly, The Statesman,Independent, Marwat Post, Middle East Online, Middle East Times, Nepal News,ABC, abc, Nepal news International, Israel  Herald,Muslim News,M Corg, Kuwait Times, Iran Daily, Afghanistan Sun, EMM News,Gulf News, Gulf Daily News, Khaleej Times, Asian Tribune, Asia Times, EI News,Bangladesh Today,Daily Star,New Age,The  Nation,Daily Mirror,The Island, Dawn, Friday Times, Daily News, Daily Times, The Telegraph, New York Times, Deccan Herald, The Pioneer, Indian Express, News from Bangladesh, Kashmir Times,Greater Kashmir, Mirror of Kashmir, Kashmir Affairs, Kashmir Watch, Kashmir Monitor, Kashmir Observer, Kashmir Newsline, Kashmir Awareness, Kashmir Images,Asian Age, Jammu Kashmir Front line, Hindustan times,SL Guardian, Times of India, Central Chronicle, Economic Times, Sahara Times,Maldives Chronicles, International Observer, Palestine Times, Pakistan Observer, Indian Muslim Observer, Foreign Policy Issues, International Opinion,  Tribune International, Wikipedia, etc, website: http://abdulruff.wordpress.com/  Phone: 91-8129081217—(Account: No 62310377429 – CIF No: 78215311481- State Bank of Hyderabad, India) abdulruff@gmail.com

Indian politics: Modi’s secrecy: Boon or tragedy for democracy?

Indian politics: Modi’s secrecy: Boon or tragedy for democracy?

 –DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL

 

_______________

 

 

With highest popular mandate in parliamentary polls in recent times, a visibly strong Narendara Modi who strengthened his hold to the power in Gujarat state and pushed his Hindutva agenda across the nation by riding over the anti-corruption tirade of Hazare-Kejriwal, to become first ever fully elected PM of India.

 

Modi has unshielded a 46 member cabinet on 26^th May when he assumed power in New Delhi, witnessed by many Indian signatories and SAARC leaders, especially the Nawaz Sharif, the PM of India’s nuke rival Pakistan which wants, more than anything else, joint cricketism exercise with Indian team so that more and more wealthy Pakistanis could visit India on that pretext, making or spending money. . .

 

Saffron secrecy, a major source of BJP in order push its ultra Hindutva agenda into practice, is back to Indian regime practices. With Narendra Modi’s thumping electoral victory the Cabinet formation was totally shrouded in secrecy, signaling what exactly is in store of the RSS for the nation that is likely to be fully saffronized to suit the RSS theological ideology. .

 

Congress is eager to see the Muslims get terrorized by the secret as well as open anti-Muslim agenda of the RSS now ruling Indian democracy so that they come back to Congress fold for speedy “protection”. .
Secrecy reigned very high during the infamous Emergency era under Congress party rule, disallowing even powerful media to know what exactly the regime was doing or contemplating.

 

One wonders if the new BJP regime is repeating that phenomenon by strict secrecy. The case of scam of telecom minister A. Raja under Manmohan Singhwould not have come out had there been complete secrecy The issue brought bad name of the Congress and UPA partners, A Raja himself lost in the poll as other DMK and Congress leaders as well in Tamil Nadu. .

 

Against all predictable political messaging in media, Modi did not give enough or no representation to states like Tamilnadu, Kerala for no performance, and Orissa and West Bengal, Assam where BJP has shown performance for the first time.
As people are looking towards seeing India becoming a developed nation in US standards, there was frenetic speculation on what sort of cabinet would Narendra Modi choose in order to deliver the big promises he has made to the nation. But the media failed badly in knowing what exactly Modi has in mind on the subject.

Modi, for instance, left out LK Advani, Subramanian Swami, among others in cabinet list submitted to the president for approval. Of course there was some certainty that top leaders of BJP such as defeated MP Arun Jaitley, Rajnath Singh, Sushma Swaraj would get some important portfolios. It is also obvious that Modi will give a major representation to UP and Bihar where BJP has made a huge dent, especially among dalits and backwards. Muslim antipathy towards Congress made things easy for BJP and allies

 

 

Modi with full majority is in much better position as he is not compelled by any coalition politics now. Normally in a coalition arrangement, as in the case of UPA, the partners were actively consulted and indeed they would make their wish known to the UPA supremo Sonia Gandhi and Prime Minister. This routinely leaked to the media and often such likely appointments would be debated in print media and on TV channels. Under UPA coalition partners routinely put their claim on certain important ministries. Mamata Banerjee had specifically asked for Railways, a high visibility portfolio from the perspective of the common man.
Though the media is incessantly speculating on the names of Cabinet ministers, the real surprise will be in terms of the structure of administration that Modi places at the top. A hint of this came from Arun Shourie who has said Modi may have a quasi Presidential style governance structure at the PMO. Arun Shourie, former journalist and Jammu Kashmir governor, is made a cabinet minister.

 

Sanjeev Baliyan, an accused in the Muzaffarnagar riots case which made the Mulayam Singh’s SP party unpopular quickly, has been made a minister by a shrewd Modi who himself is involved in the Gujarat riots.

 

NDA is irrelevant now as BJP has taken over that. There are no claimants from among the coalition partners and only Modi knows what sort of Cabinet ministers he will appoint.

—————–

 

 

India state arrogance: Blast at Kudankulam nuclear plant

India state arrogance: Blast at Kudankulam nuclear plant

-DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL

___________

Indian state and its nuclear agents have endangered the  people of India, the  poor locals who reside in  notorious nuclear  plant attack prone and  nuke attack prone zones. The state arrogance is complicated by  adamancy of political leaders at national and regional levels.  They care a damn aoub the people’s genuine concerns and put  them in  perpetual danger by adding more nuclear projects in their localities

 

A fresh blast has occurred the newly build nuclear power plant at Kudankulam village in Tamil Nadu, India, scarring the people of Kudankulam and entire Tamil Nadu.

Six workers got seriously injured and  they have been admitted to  a private  hospital in nearby Paravthipuram, Nagercoil. As expected the blast s did not harm any big plant officials, ministers, MPs or MLAs, or those Congress-BJP politicians who campaigned for start of the nuclear plant  in Kudankulam at any cost,  Obviously,  all concerned leaders Manmohan Singh, Narayana swamy, J. Jayalalithaaa, Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, LK Advani, Karunanidhi, Vajpayee, Modi and  Tody, etc are safe in their respective AC bungalows made out of the resources  from the people. ,

The nuclear plant was put into operation recently and it already produced electrify, not knowing that it would blast any time. .

The nuclear tragedy, which is imminent, occurred at about 2 pm, causing serious doubts about the viability of nuclear plants as a reliable source of electricity generation when there are other safe sources available for the purpose. .

Unfortunately, the Indian government led by nuke agents pushed the Supreme court  to  clear the  operation of the plant saying everything at the plant is safe.

Indian regime, managed by both Congress and BJP have made nukes prediction as India’s major military policy and went ahead with commissioning nuclear plants with complete disregard for the safety of the nuke pants and security of the people living in nuke terror zones. .

Experts say in order to make nuclear energy more palatable for citizens, particularly in light of the accident in Fukushima in Japan earlier this year; the government will need placate the fears of its people over the safety and security of nuclear facilities.

There should a nationwide drive to guarantee that India can power its own economic growth and support a growing population without relying too heavily on nuclear plants.

Indian poll politrics:: They now target Aam Admi Party!

 

 

Indian poll politrics:: They now target Aam Admi Party!

-DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL 

_______________

 

Common or Aam Aadmi people, who form the majority of vote banks in India, have been  badly misused by the political parties to promote their corporatist private interests.  Not only the common people are  supposed to exercise their franchise to  save “democracy”,  but also  come in big numbers to meetings where leaders address to  outsmart their opponents and loot the resources. 

 

Aam Admi Party emerged as the first ever party to  take up the genuine interests of common people last year.  After winning the Delhi polls, now it seeks mandate of people of India, disillusioned with political parties playing with them, to cleanse the nation’s politics, the disillusioned parties like Congress and BJP have begun targeting the new party by various usual gimmicks employed in Indian politrics.  

 

The AAP government said it would launch a “pol khol” (expose) campaign against the BJP and Congress, the two most important national parties that have ruled India, to expose their “conspiracy” against the Delhi government. 

 

 

Big parties are seeking to  somehow contain the rise of AAP at national level. As Indian parliamentary poll is nearing, the national parties like Congress and BJP that have stakes in the national poll politics have now focused on the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) which was voted to power by Delhiites.

 

 

They make the same accusations they hurled against the party   during the Delhi poll saying the Aam Aadmi Party has no history and experience. Delhi people elected the new, inexperienced part without big finances to govern them in t its own popular ways. They are misusing the AAP leaders to agitate against the party and CM Arvind Kejriwal.

 

It is obvious, once the election dates are announced there would be a stream of serious politicians among other anti-corruption people joining the AAP all over India, strengthening the roots of genuine democracy in India.

 

So,  already, there is a  deep rooted conspiracy to make AAP unpopular in the eyes of  national India so as to make people  do not  throng  towards the new party without any strong national infrastructure.  People are generally impressed by the new party’s performance in the poll and post-poll governance of Delhi state.

 

 

Pro-corruption conspiracy

 

 As people lost hopes for  corruption free  governments both at the centre and states  Aam Aadmi Party came as a boon for the common people of India. 

 

Indian rulers and leaders just enjoy politics along with the benefits it offers and corruption and other crimes have come to stay in Indian political sphere. .

 

Most MPs and MLAs, if not all, who thrive by supporting the rich and corporate lords, do not want to get rid of rampant corruption harming the cause of common people.  

 

 

 

In the December 2013 Delhi assembly elections, the AAP won 28 seats in the 70-member house and formed the government with the outside support of the Congress that had won eight seats. 

 

The political parties had expected the new AAP also go ashtray by becoming a corrupt party like others.  But the new party has its now new ethics in politics.

 

This worries our happy politicians who know all routes of wealth making. 

. 

 

 

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has accused the BJP of trying to bribe some of its MLAs in a bid to topple its government in Delhi. The AAP alleged that Narendra Modi in collusion with Arun Jaitley was trying to topple the one-month government. AAP MLA Madan Lal in a press conference said he was offered Rs. 20 crore to be a part of the BJP government.  Madal Lal said he got a call on December 7, 2013, from a international number saying that they wanted to fix a meeting with Arun Jaitley. He also alleged that a man approached him saying that he will be made the chief minister of Delhi if he could get another nine people to join the BJP.   

 

Madal Lal refused to buy the BJP stuff. Arun Jaitley denied having  tried to bribe  Lal. 

 

 

Blackmailing tactics 

 

 

 

 

A Delhi legislator Vinod Kumar Binny, who  began criticizing the Kejriwal leadership  when he was denied a ministerial berth in Delhi government.  Binny as later expelled from the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) for anti-party activities,  he and Janata Dal-United (JD-U) MLA Shoaib Iqbal have threatened to withdraw support to the one-month-old government if it did not agree to their demands. The duo, who also announced launching of an independent political outfit, demanded the rollback of six-eight percent power rate surcharge, supplying daily 700 litres of water without any condition and probe against the corrupt people named by the party in its poll campaign. 

 

Of AAP’s 28 lawmakers, one was elected speaker and another MLA, Binny was expelled for anti-party activities. Iqbal and an Independent extended support to the AAP in the assembly. They set a deadline of 48 hours for the AAP to fulfill the demands. “If our demands are not met, we will be forced to re-think the support we have given,” Iqbal said in a press conference. 

 

 

Binny also claimed to have the support of three other legislators, including an Independent who had supported the AAP government during the crucial vote of trust.  

 

 

 

Meanwhile, another disgruntled former diplomat and AAP founding member Mrs. Madhu Bhaduri quit the party with a blistering attack on what she called the Arvind Kejriwal- led outfit’s “anti-women attitude”. Her resignation came two days after she was allegedly heckled at AAP’s National Council meeting for seeking to move a resolution apologizing to the Ugandan women allegedly harassed by Law Minister Somnath Bharti in a midnight raid of a secret mignight house last month.  “I am disappointed and disillusioned. The party said the matter will be investigated. When Arvind Kejriwal took oath, he said two things; one that people should neither give bribe nor accept it. And then he sang a song about humanity. But if humanity is the basis of this party, then what happened on the intervening night of January 15 and 16 was a big blow to humanity,” Bhaduri said, referring to the Khirki Extension raid. My issue is not whether Bharti should be removed or not. My issue is humanity.  Women are human too but this party is not treating them like human beings,” Bhaduri added. 

 

Bhaduri’s contention, however, found few takers even among the party’s women leaders. AAP MLA Bandana Kumari said the party is working on issues of female security and education. “We are working towards forming female/ mahila commando teams and female education is our priority. Also, we as women are free to say anything in the party. The party does not stop anyone from expressing their mind,” said Kumari. “Women are respected the most by the party,” fellow party member Ashutosh added. 

 

Promise kept

 

 

Upon winning the Delhi poll,  Aam Aadmi leader and CM Arvind Kejriwal has already begun fulfilling all poll promises. 

 

AAP spokesperson Dilip Pandey also refuted allegations that Bhaduri was heckled at the National Council meet. She said something that the party did not agree with, and was not a part of the agenda of the meeting. Therefore, she was asked to stop as others were waiting for their turn to speak.

 

 

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Sanjay Singh said at a press conference that the Delhi government had fulfilled some of its assurances to the people and on the remaining it was taking steps to fulfill them.  Sanjay Singh said the Delhi government has kept its poll promise on slashing electricity and water bills and on launching an anti-corruption landline. He said the BJP is worried about AAP’s popularity and the work done by the Arvind Kejriwal government.  “Because of our anti-corruption helpline people are scared of taking bribes,” he said, adding that their demand for a Special Investigation Team (SIT) on the 1984 anti-Sikh riot was part of its poll promises. “For 30 years, Sikhs have not got justice. We promised a SIT, and now big leaders are worried what will happen.”

 

Sanjay Singh alleged that BJP leader Arun Jaitley, Harsh Vardhan and others “are trying their level best to pull down the AAP government. He alleged the protest by expelled AAP MLA Vinod Kumar Binny and two other MLAs was part of a game-plan. He said the AAP has come to learn through “top secret source” that Jaitley in the coming days along with “media friends will try to tarnish the government. They will try to show bribe taking and take all steps to defame our government.” He said for the first time the people of Delhi feel some hope with the AAP government “but the BJP wants to stamp it out and pull down the government”.

 

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) members on February 04 protested outside BJP leader Arun Jaitley’s house following which BJP workers too hit back and held a counter-protest against the party, particularly targeting Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.

 

 

 

Big cheats 

 

 

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal last week read out his list of ‘India’s most corrupt’, and it included high profile politicians from the Congress, the BJP and their allies, and urged his Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) members to treat this year’s general election as a revolution to cleanse the nation’s politics. Kejriwal’s list included many leaders and politicians cutting across the political spectrum of the nation. BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi, Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi, Nitin Gadkari, Sushil Kumar Shinde, Praful Patel, BS Yeddyurappa, Anant Kumar, Veerappa Moily, HD Kumaraswamy, Salman Khurshid, Annu Tandon, Tarun Gogoi, Kapil Sibal, Mayawati, Mulayam Singh, Sriprakash Jaiswal, Pawan Bansal, Farooq Abdullah,  sport meet manipulator Suresh Kalmadi, A Raja, Alagari, Kanimozhi, and Naveen Jindal.

 

Addressing a party meet ahead of discussions in the Delhi cabinet on the party’s proposed anti-graft Jan Lokpal Bill that seeks to punish corruption with a maximum sentence of life in jail, Kejriwal said: “Don’t let a single corrupt politician enter Parliament.” “We have not come to play politics; we have come to remove corruption. Our aim should be that not a single corrupt person exists in parliament,” he added. He further said they need to change all this as they have not come just to fight in the elections for minting money or making wealth for leaders.  “The people of the country will fight this election. We are providing an option to the people of the country, and the country has to work to make sure that not one corrupt person is elected to parliament,” he added. 

 

Observations

 

 

 

Government-people relations are shaped by the contemporary systemic trends like demographic change, water stress, resource competition, among many other factors. 

 

The widening gap between people’s expectations and the capacity of governments to meet them is the outcome of harmful perceptions of selfish and greedy politicians. 

 

Governments must realize that in today’s competitive environment, institutions and states that are not agile were condemned to becoming obsolete. 

 

While seeking to address the problems the Delhiites and Indians face today, AAP should also consider debating feasibility of its projects in the light of possibilities available to it. It should also consider the ways of amending the present situations. 

 

Delhi government should should unhesitatingly use all available resources for the people’s sake and uplift. 

 

Anti-Common-man Party forces are now targeting the Delhi government and obviously they were expected to do it any time since the assumption of office by the Aam Aadmi party led the Delhi government. 

 

These anti-people forces have been waiting impatiently to see AAP fail in delivering the poll promises. But they are disappointed as the Kejriwal government began fulfilling the pledges given the Delhiites one by one.  

 

They had expected the Kejriwal and ministers would begin enjoy life, but the new leaders without any ruling experience began living simple life like ordinary people.

 

As far as inner party quarrels are concerned, such areas but natural in view of the present political situation when individuals enter politics to make money and so the AAP must have serious debate inside the party to sort out differences.  Members should keep the people’s and state’s interests about personal ambitions.  

AAP must reconsider if the demands placed by Binny, who is annoyed with Kejriwal for not making him a minister, really merits attention. 

 

Consensus and positive considerations can resolve all problems amicably rather than rigidity.  Where possible, accommodation should be preferred without harming the party ideals. Since people’s concerns are  more importance than personal interests,  none should  aim to be at the helm of affairs  permanently- a fact  that all parties  follow an at  the cost of common people’s , nation’s  genuine interests. 

 

Aam Aadmi Party needs not  entertain the corrupt and greedy elements but at the same time  prefer  people to should responsibilities  who  do not have personal or private interests in the party and unwilling to  comprehend the party  ideology which is entirely different form the  routine ones  now prevailing in the country. 

 

Aam Admi Party is mandated to create a new political culture not just for Delhi but for the nation.

 

 

 

But one thing is certain: the common people in India are on the rise now!

 

Kejriwal  ah snot yet began vising other state capitals to  convey his message to Indian masses as MK Gandhi had it  long ago. 

 

AAP has a duty to assure the common masses of their place in India. 

 

Time does not wait for any body, please!

 

 

د. عبد راف 

Unfortunately, today there is not even on Muslim nation practicing  truly Islamic faith. 

–BY DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL has been an Educationist, Columnist-Commentator  on world affairs Expert on Mideast Affairs,  Former university Teacher;  Editor:INTERNATIONAL OPINION; FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES; Author of books;website: http://abdulruff.wordpress.com/  Phone: 91-8129081217—(Account: No 62310377429 – CIF No: 78215311481- State Bank of Hyderabad, India) abdulruff@gmail.com

_____________________

Defending Edward Snowden: Snowden fears foul trial in USA

 

Defending Edward Snowden: Snowden fears foul trial in USA

(Story of US spying networks)

 

-DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL

_______________

Liquidation of foes has been a major US-CIA policy pursued for decades now especially after the World War two.  While no American officials could be punished for their crimes, their foes do not get a fair chance for explanation- they are just eliminated.

Former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden is facing similar situation when US officials have threatened kill him for revealing the US state secrets about crimes against people.

Fair trials and trust worthy judgments can build up healthy systems.

However, generally, both fair trial and genuine justice are denied to people, resulting in systemic paralysis, leading to distrust in the judiciary and system. .

America, claiming to be the largest democracy on earth is threatening with murder of Edward Snowden for his bold action.

Snowden has leaked intelligence to Russians, thereby committing treason against USA, according to the US officials  who now want to just get him killed.

But by doing so, Edward Snowden has done a yeomen service to the humanity as the world today has become fully aware of all hidden agendas of USA even before they perpetrated the Sept-11 crime in order to obtain legitimacy to invade Muslim nations one by one. Snowden has exposed only US crimes on average Americans and people all over the world but could do more shocking revelations in future.

For this very reason, American officials just want to remove him from the world.

The NSA’s mass surveillance program has caused widespread anger after they were leaked by Snowden. The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board advised by a 3-2 majority that the program should end.

Edward Snowden, formerly linked to CIA, left the US in late May after leaking to the media details of extensive internet and phone surveillance by American intelligence. Snowden, who has been granted temporary asylum in Russia, faces espionage charges over his actions.

Two of the charges laid against him by the Obama administration are felony counts under the Espionage Act, which carry the death penalty. And the record of American imperialism in assassinating figures it deems politically undesirable is well established—from the days when the CIA earned the title Murder Inc. to Obama’s drone strikes.

Edward Snowden has said he has “no chance” of a fair trial in the USA and so he has no plans to return there. The 30-year-old has temporary asylum in Russia after leaking details of US electronic surveillance programs.  He said that his predicament over not having a fair trial was “especially frustrating”.

In December Snowden delivered an “alternative” Christmas message to Britain’s Channel 4 TV, in which he called for an end to mass surveillance. Earlier  an independent US privacy watchdog ruled that the bulk collection of phone call data by US intelligence agencies is illegal and has had only “minimal” benefits in preventing terrorism. Snowden reiterated that the 100-year-old law under which he has been charged “forbids a public interest defense. There’s no way I can come home and make my case to a jury,” he said.

Snowden said:”Returning to the US, I think, is the best resolution for the government, the public, and myself, but it’s unfortunately not possible in the face of current whistleblower protection laws, which, through a failure in law, did not cover national security contractors like me,” he told the “Free Snowden” website. “Maybe when Congress comes together to end the programs… They’ll reform the Whistleblower Protection Act, and we’ll see a mechanism for all Americans, no matter who they work for, to get a fair trial.”

 

US Attorney General Eric Holder insists that Snowden must accept responsibility for leaking government secrets.

USA, unlike its strategic partners like India that shield their citizens in all possible ways,  does not want to defend Snowden.

 

The Obama regime fears that “a trial could potentially bring further disclosures and—from the government’s point of view —risks galvanizing even more popular support for Snowden.

 

In an interview yesterday with the German television network ARD,  Edward Snowden warned that US “government officials want to kill me. These government officials, have said they would love to put a bullet in my head or poison me when I come out of the supermarket, and then watch as I die in the shower,” Snowden said.

Snowden’s warning that the US government wants him dead to suppress his revelations of illegal NSA spying must be taken with the utmost seriousness. It raises the urgency of developing a mass movement to defend him and oppose the destruction of democratic rights.

It is quite likely that US officials would authorize criminal gangs across the globe to target him,  just by casually being poked by a passerby. He would think nothing of it at the time and starts to feel a little woozy and thinks it’s a parasite from the local water. He goes home very innocently and next thing you know he is dead in the shower.”

Washington can justify any official murders as they are entirely consistent with the political gangsterism being employed to prepare Snowden’s liquidation.

The Obama  regime,  like before him,  has already carried out extra-judicial murders not only in Pakistan and Afghanistan, but even of four US citizens with Hellfire missiles.

The desire to end the revelations of US spying on people all over the world quickly is shared by the agents of the NSA, CIA and Pentagon all the way up to the White House.

All of them have got a common stakes.

Clearly, the US government has no intention of offering Snowden a fair trial. Snowden and his attorney have made this clear.

 

Snowden said that any proceeding against him would be a show trial, with the 1917 Espionage Act employed to preclude his putting up a defense of his actions based on their exposure of a secretive and illegal police state apparatus. Documents supporting his defense would be deemed classified and ruled out as evidence, and he would have no opportunity to appeal to the democratic sensibilities of the jury.

The political witch-hunt that the US establishment is whipping up against Snowden demonstrates that it has no intention of offering any trial.

The deal is merely political cover for the plans of the US government to use extra-judicial means to bring a halt to the exposure of its illegal spying operations.

 

The proposal that Snowden return to the US and quietly accept imprisonment boils down to the ultimatum: If Snowden were to set foot on US soil, no one would ever see him again.

 

Snowden is now living as a stateless refugee in Russia, and the threat of state murder is very real whether or not he returns to the USA.

 

 

Snowden’s revelations are exposing those in power as the real criminals, making them all the more determined to physically shut him up and make an example of him.

 

White House has devised, authorized and implemented mass spying programs, a system of total control over the population, in brazen violation of both the law and the fundamental rights spelled out in the US Constitution.

The police state apparatus that has been exposed by Snowden’s revelations has been built up to defend the interests of the financial oligarchy that controls the US government. Its totalitarian operations are aimed not at foiling terrorist plots, but at furthering American capitalism’s predatory aims.

 

Abroad, these entail preparing wars, also spying on supposed allies and carrying out industrial espionage against rival corporations. At home, they mean spying and collecting dossiers on American working people, who are seen as an increasingly hostile and dangerous enemy.

 

 

The corporate media funded by arms lobbies among other gangs, as usual, have smeared Snowden as a traitor and spy.

Polls show mass support for Snowden. There is growing anxiety within the ruling establishment that Snowden’s courageous actions express not just his own opposition to the criminal activities of the government, but sentiments building up among the population at large, and particularly among workers, students and youth. These layers are increasingly fed up with a government of the rich, by the rich and for the rich that destroys democratic rights as it transfers the social wealth to the financial aristocracy and wages wars of aggression.

Edward Snowden must be defended by all means so that democracy is saved and secret diplomacy and polices, police state operations end.

 

Spy network

 As the only super power of the globe,  USA now officially controls the world powers.  None can challenge or  question America. 

It is obvious that USA  has the largest  spy network  today,  collecting  complete information about individuals,  groups, organizations, nations and  leaders. 

Exposure of US spy networks has taken the world by surprise and shock.  privacy of individuals, especially the global leaders,  has become a major causality of the  nefarious spy operations. . 

The scandal broke in early June 2013 when the Guardian newspaper reported that the US National Security Agency (NSA) was collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of Americans. The paper published the secret court order directing telecommunications company Verizon to hand over all its telephone data to the NSA on an “ongoing daily basis”.

That report was followed by revelations in both the Washington Post and Guardian that the NSA tapped directly into the servers of nine internet firms including Face book, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo to track online communication in a surveillance program known as Prism.  Britain’s electronic eavesdropping agency GCHQ was also accused of gathering information on the online companies via Prism.

Shortly afterwards, the Guardian revealed that ex-CIA systems analyst Edward Snowden was behind the leaks about the US and UK surveillance programs. He has been charged in the US with theft of government property, unauthorized communication of national defence information and willful communication of classified communications intelligence.UK spy agency ‘taps fibre-optic cables’

The GCHQ scandal widened on 21 June when the Guardian reported that the UK spy agency was tapping fibre-optic cables that carry global communications and sharing vast amounts of data with the NSA, its US counterpart. GCHQ was able to boast a larger collection of data than the US, tapping in to 200 fibre-optic cables to give it the ability to monitor up to 600 million communications every day, according to the report.

The information from internet and phone use was allegedly stored for up to 30 days to be sifted and analysed.

GCHQ and NSA eavesdropping on Italian phone calls and internet traffic was reported by the Italian weekly L’Espresso on 24 October. The revelations were sourced to Edward Snowden. It is alleged that three undersea cables with terminals in Italy were targeted. Italian Prime Minister Enrico Letta called the allegations “inconceivable and unacceptable” and said he wanted to establish the truth. USA ‘hacks China networks’

After fleeing to Hong Kong, Edward Snowden told the South China Morning Post that the NSA had led more than 61,000 hacking operations worldwide, including many in Hong Kong and mainland China.

Claims emerged on 29 June that the NSA had also spied on European Union offices in the US and Europe. The US had spied on EU internal computer networks in Washington and at the 27-member bloc’s UN office in New York. One document dated September 2010 explicitly named the EU representation at the UN as a “location target”.

The NSA had also conducted an electronic eavesdropping operation in a building in Brussels, where the EU Council of Ministers and the European Council were located.

The German government summoned the US ambassador on 24 October – a very unusual step – after German media reported that the NSA had eavesdropped on Chancellor Angela Merkel’s mobile phone.

The allegations dominated an EU summit, with Mrs Merkel demanding a full explanation and warning that trust between allies could be undermined. She discussed the matter by phone with US President Barack Obama. He assured her that her calls were not being monitored now and that it would not happen in future. But the White House did not deny bugging her phone in the past.

Past surveillance by secret police – whether Nazi or communist – has made Germans very sensitive about privacy issues. Mrs Merkel grew up in the former East Germany, where the Stasi spied on millions of citizens.

France’s President Francois Hollande meanwhile expressed alarm at reports that millions of French calls had been monitored by the USA. The Guardian later reported that the NSA had monitored the phones of 35 world leaders after being given their numbers by another US government official. Again, Edward Snowden was the source of the report. A total of 38 embassies and missions have been the “targets” of US spying operations, according to a secret file leaked to the Guardian. Countries targeted included France, Italy and Greece, as well as America’s non-European allies such as Japan, South Korea and India, the paper reported on 1 July. EU embassies and missions in New York and Washington were also said to be under surveillance.

The file allegedly detailed “an extraordinary range” of spying methods used to intercept messages, including bugs, specialized antennae and wire taps.

US Secretary of State John Kerry said that activities to protect national security were “not unusual” in international relations. Latin America ‘monitored’

US allies in Latin America were angered by revelations in Brazil’s O Globo newspaper on 10 July that the NSA ran a continent-wide surveillance program.

US agents apparently joined forces with Brazilian telecoms firms to snoop on oil and energy firms, foreign visitors to Brazil, and major players in Mexico’s drug wars. Mexico, Brazil, Colombia and Chile all demanded answers from the US.

But in September more specific claims emerged that emails and phone calls of the presidents of Mexico and Brazil had been intercepted. Also, the US had been spying on Brazil’s state-owned oil firm Petrobras.

Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff cancelled a state visit to the US in the most high-profile diplomatic move since the scandal hit.US spying ‘errors’

Documents leaked to the Washington Post in mid-August suggested the NSA breaks US privacy laws hundreds of times every year.

The papers revealed that US citizens were inadvertently snooped on for reasons including typing mistakes and errors in the system,

Later in August, the Washington Post reported that US spy agencies had a “black budget” for secret operations of almost $53bn in 2013. SMS messages ‘collected and stored’

In January 2014, the Guardian newspaper and Channel Four News reported that the US had collected and stored almost 200 million text messages per day across the globe.

A National Security Agency (NSA) program is said to have extracted and stored data from the SMS messages to gather location information, contacts and financial data.

The documents also revealed that GCHQ had used the NSA database to search for information on people in the UK.

The program, Dishfire, analyses SMS messages to extract information including contacts from missed call alerts, location from roaming and travel alerts, financial information from bank alerts and payments and names from electronic business cards. Through the vast database, which was in use at least as late as 2012, the NSA gained information on those who were not specifically targeted or under suspicion, the report says.

The revelations came on the eve of an expected announcement by President Obama of a response to recommendations by a US panel on ways to change US electronic surveillance programs.

 

–BY DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL has been an Educationist, Columnist-Commentator  on world affairs Expert on Mideast Affairs,  Former university Teacher;  Editor:INTERNATIONAL OPINION; FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES; Author of books;website: http://abdulruff.wordpress.com/  Phone: 91-8129081217—(Account: No 62310377429 – CIF No: 78215311481- State Bank of Hyderabad, India) abdulruff@gmail.com

_____________________

Saudi led Arabs should let Syrian peace talks succeed!

 

786

 

Humanity has a right to know the truth which does not require endorsements. 

 

 

Saudi led Arabs should let Syrian peace talks succeed!

 

-DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL 

_______________

 

 

Enemies of Islam, now including both the West and Gulf states, continue to target Muslims can celebrate their temporary gains against Islam and Muslims as more and more Muslims get killed across the globe. Syria is latest battle field to fell Muslims on both side of the political divide. Already over 130,000 people have been slaughtered in Syria  in nearly three years and at least 700 people have been killed since the fresh fighting started January 3.

President Assad’s forces reportedly make steady gains on the ground amid deadly internal fighting in the rebellion pitting the once-dominant Islamists against resurgent fighters from groups more palatable to the West.

Upon successfully engineered Islamophobia by USA-Russia terror twins first through Soviet occupation of Afghanistan for nearly a decade, and then Sept-11 very skillfully perpetrated by USA to attack Afghanistan to obtain legitimacy for the CIA’s plan for war on Islam, killing millions of Muslims

Unfortunately, many Muslim nations, including Arab nations where Islam took birth, also fully engaged in and partially financed with petrodollars the NATO war on Islam.

Now Arabs are shocked and annoyed because the NATO is still reluctant to attack Shiite Iran and Sunni Syria so that Islam could become a religion supplying Muslims slaves to NATO rouges.

Arab nations and Israel continue to pressure the White House to go for the kill in Iran and Syria. .

The so-called “Geneva II” talks due to start on January 22 have been organised in an attempt to revive the idea of moving to a transitional government including figures from the current regime and the opposition.

After trying to entice Syrian rebels into Geneva peace talks by vowing to exclude the Moscow-backed Damascus regime from any future transition government, the top US diplomat John Kerry meets his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov in Switzerland, Kerry said he was “confident” the rebel-opposition would attend the upcoming talks.

Earlier, Kerry also had a meeting in Paris of the so-called “Friends of Syria” group of mainly Western and Gulf countries opposed to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. He met National Coalition leader Ahmad Jarba, whose grouping includes the main opposition movement in exile, and was due to hold further talks with him on 13^th January. “I am confident that he and others will be in Geneva.,” he said. Jarba was equally upbeat, saying a “milestone” had been passed in diplomatic efforts to end the conflict, which is believed to have killed at least 130,000 people in nearly three years.

In a statement, the 11-nation joint West-Arab “Friends of Syria” team said that once a transitional government is established Assad and his close associates with blood on their hands will have no role in Syria. ”  I would welcome any initiative Iran wishes to take, if they do, to try to provide a resolution to the crisis of Syria,” Kerry said. “The first thing they can do is accept the Geneva communiqué,” he said, in reference to a first round of talks held in June 2012 which called for a transitional government recognising the opposition.

The “friends” try to somehow bring in Assad for talks to claim “victory”. Whether that could involve Assad himself is an issue that has generally been fudged in the past and may have the potential to capsize the negotiations: Assad’s aides have repeatedly said they have no intention of coming to Switzerland to hand over power.

This issue is likely to feature prominently in Kerry’s discussions with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and UN-Arab League envoy Lakhdar Brahimi. Another key point in their talks will be whether Iran, which has been instrumental in propping up Assad, should have any role in peace talks further down the line. Meanwhile, Iran announced through an official television network that its foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, would travel to Damascus in the next few days. “If we receive an invitation without any preconditions, Zarif said in Beirut.

Jarba has previously called for Assad to stop using heavy weapons, lift sieges on a number of opposition-held areas and allow the opening of humanitarian corridors as a show of good faith ahead of any talks. There has been no sign of progress on those issues but, with little prospect of securing a military victory, the opposition has few alternatives to negotiations. British Foreign Secretary William Hague said “This is going to put the Assad regime on the spot if everybody turns up at those peace talks”. Kerry would not be drawn on what would happen if Assad pulled out of the talks. “With respect to the Assad regime we have been told from day one they allegedly are prepared to negotiate,” he said.

 

The balance of power appears to have tipped in Assad’s favour over as deadly clashes have erupted between the mainstream opposition and an Al Qaeda-linked group, the US controlled Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), with which they were previously allied.

It is high time, the Arab leaders gave up anti-Shiite stand and desire to target them forthwith so that peace could be given a fair chance in Mideast which is reeling under the fiercest conflict around Palestine territories

Arab nations should consider drop all their wicked plans against Islam by seeking to enjoy tasting Shiite blood.

Arab world while discarding cheap anti-Islamic thoughts, must also reconsider their policy for Western essentially anti-Islamic nations.

 

 

 

 

 

د. عبد راف 

Unfortunately, today there is not even on Muslim nation practicing  truly Islamic faith. 

–BY DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL has been an Educationist, Columnist-Commentator  on world affairs Expert on Mideast Affairs,  Former university Teacher;  Editor:INTERNATIONAL OPINION; FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES; Author of books;website: http://abdulruff.wordpress.com/  Phone: 91-8129081217—(Account: No 62310377429 – CIF No: 78215311481- State Bank of Hyderabad, India) abdulruff@gmail.com

_____________________

U.S. nuclear warhead stockpile, 1945-2002. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

English: IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria. Photographed by Sarajevo-x.com, 25 March 2007. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

786

 

 

 

Humanity has a right to know the truth. 

 

 

 

 

د. عبد راف 

 

 

WMD world map (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

–BY DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL [Educationist, Specialist on State Terrorism; Chronicler of Foreign occupations & Freedom movements (Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc.) Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA);  Commentator  on world affairs & sport fixings, Expert on Mideast Affairs,Former university Teacher;  Editor:INTERNATIONAL OPINION; Editor: FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES;  Palestine Times: RANDOM THOUGHTS; Author of many books;(http://abdulrubb.wordpress.com);  website: http://abdulruff.wordpress.com/ mail: abdulruff_jnu@yahoo.com]

 

_____________________

 

Surely, enemies of humanity led by USA-Israeli terror twins pose the most dangerous threat to civilization with their cumulative nuclear arsenals, the WMD.

 

Unless the veto is done away with, there is absolutely no chance for the humanity survival from the onslaught of these rouge states backed by all top terrocracies of the globe

 

1. Americans support Zionist nukes, shielding crimes against humanity   

 

The ways all western terrocracies shield the criminal Israeli regime from any punishment for its crimes against humanity and international community by misusing their fascist veto clearly show how Zionist they are!

 

US president Obama, as part of US Mideast policy, also promotes Zionist regime with more terror arms, disturbing already fragile peace in the region. US foreign secretary Kerry goes all the way to Israel to endorse the Zionist nukes and crimes sending a clear message that Americans have duty to shield Zionist criminals and that Israeli criminals are indeed the US terror babies.

 

American leaders, cutting across political spectrum, are engaged in triclomatic exercises to woo every prominent terrocracy to promote Zionist fascism as being a part of western imperialism and global fascism. .

 

For decades now, the monstrous Israel with its illegal nuclear arms remains the most serious threat to Mideast and world as a whole. And unless Israeli nukes are destroyed there is no chance for peace but the USA and Israel would continue to sell their terror goods to the world.

 

When Arab leaders protest against Israeli illegal nuke arsenals threatening the regional peace forever, USA come to support Israeli nukes, while it condemns nukes of Israel and Syria.

 

 

 

2.  Arab resolution at IAEA

 

Israel is widely believed to possess the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal, threatening the  balance in the region and thus drawing frequent condemnation by Arab countries and Iran which say it threatens peace and security.  But the unilateral United States said earlier that targeting its “close ally” would only hurt broader steps aimed at banning nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction in the tinderbox region.

 

 

 

Knowing the monstrous military power of USA-Israeli twins, Arab states seek peace in the region by getting Israeli nukes dismantled legally and had submitted a non-binding resolution on Israel to the gathering of the 159-nation International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna for the first time since 2010 to signal their frustration at the lack of movement in efforts to create a Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction. On 29^th September the member states of the U.N. nuclear agency rejected an Iranian-backed Arab bid to focus Israel for criticism over its assumed atomic arsenal, in a diplomatic victory for Western powers that opposed the initiative

 

 

 

The debate and vote at an annual meeting of the IAEA underlined divisions at a time when the United States and its allies are hoping for progress in a separate, decade-old nuclear dispute with Iran. .  Fifty-one countries voted against the text, which called on Israel to join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and 43 states for. Others abstained or were absent.

 

 

 

The Arab push had been a mainstay of most recent annual meetings of the 159-nation International Atomic Energy Agency, where it was usually narrowly voted down. Ahead of the vote, diplomats said the motion would likely pass or fail by no more than one or two votes. But unfortunately while 43 backed the resolution and 32 abstained under US pressure, 54 nations voted for Israeli nukes and threat to the region,. The other 30 countries refused to take part during the vote. One diplomat at the meeting said the outcome was the result of strong U.S.-led lobbying on behalf of Israel.

 

 

 

The U.S. envoy to the IAEA, Joseph Macmanus, said the United States regretted that the resolution had been brought to a vote. Declaring that the vote had “no winners,” Macmanus said work would continue on starting Middle East dialogue on creating a zone free of weapons of mass destruction. A happy Israeli diplomat said the “positive outcome gives better prospect to Middle East dialogue”.

 

 

 

Describing his country’s nuclear activities as peaceful, Iranian delegate Reza Najafi said it is Israel that poses “a serious and continuing threat to the security of neighboring states.”

 

The fascist Jewish state has long said that a full Palestinian-Israeli peace plan must precede any creation of a Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction. In order to be on safer side, the Israelis just describe Iran and its alleged work on nuclear weapons as the real regional menace, though Iran denies wanting such arms. The Mideastern Muslim nations assert that Zionist Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal presents the greatest threat to peace in the region. They insist that Israel should declare such weapons and join the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty as part of any peace talks.

 

 

 

3. Nuke powers oppose disarmament

 

 

 

The Jewish state is overwhelmingly considered to possess such arms but declines to confirm it. Its Arab neighbors say Israel’s nuclear weapons threaten peace in the Middle East and miss few international opportunities to criticize it on that account. Still, it was the first time in three years that a resolution critical of Israel was put to a vote at the annual conference of the U.N’s International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna. The Arab decision to do so reflected frustration over failed attempts to convene senior-level talks on banning weapons of mass destruction from the Mideast. At the same time, more nations opposed the resolution than expected.

 

 

 

The resolution was not introduced in 2011 and 2012, in what the IAEA’s 18 Arab members viewed as a concession to keep hopes alive of the Mideast weapons talks. Efforts to convene such talks, co-sponsored by the United States, Russia and Britain, were called off late last year. While Syria’s civil war, nuclear tensions with Iran, and other Middle East frictions were cited as the official motive, diplomats back then acknowledged that the real reason was the failure to bridge Arab-Israeli differences.

 

 

 

World powers agreed in 2010 to an Egyptian plan for an international conference to lay the groundwork for creating a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction. But the United States with largest nukes and one of the big powers to co-sponsor the meeting said late last year it would not take place as planned last December and did not suggest a new date. Britain, another sponsor, says it hopes it can still take place in 2013.

 

Like in previous years, the IAEA conference overwhelmingly adopted a separate resolution urging all Middle East countries to accede to the NPT, without mentioning Israel by name. Arab diplomats said they refrained from putting forward the resolution on Israel at the 2011 and 2012 IAEA meetings to boost the chances of the Middle East conference but it had no effect. Arab League Ambassador Ramzy Ezzeldin Ramzy earlier told Reuters: “The Israelis have been playing for time, delaying.”

 

 

 

Israel, USA-UK terror twins, and allies fended off an Arab-led attempt to censure the Jewish state’s refusal to acknowledge that it possesses nuclear weapons and put them under international oversight. Israel and the United States accuse Iran of covertly seeking a nuclear arms capability, something Tehran denies. The election of a relative moderate, Hassan Rouhani, as new Iranian president has raised hopes of an easing of tension with the West.

 

 

 

Observations

 

 

 

Israeli nukes are true and their threat to Mideast is real. Analysts like Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S. Norris wrote that Israel has 80 nuclear warheads. Israel still does not reveal that to the world or IAEA effectively controlled by USA-UK-Israel terror rogue gang. The vote in favor of Israel shows Israel can do anything with its illegal nukes and escape punishment thanks to the all powerful USA.

 

That is real tragedy for the humanity, accelerated by UNSC veto regime.

 

Americans fuel Israeli arrogance and boldness with more and more terror goods. Officials of US- Israeli terror twins want to see Iran’s atomic activity as the main proliferation threat saying a nuclear arms-free zone in the Middle East could not be a reality until there was broad Arab-Israeli peace and Iran curbed its program.

 

 

 

The concentration on Syria now by US-Israeli twins is essentially meant to deflect attention from the large quantities of chemical weapons held by Israel and the fundamental challenge posed by military terrorism in Egypt targeting Also, all bull talk about Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is only to shield the Zionist nukes and criminals.

 

 

 

The historic defeat of Arab resolution for IAEA vote can be both misleading and dangerous!

 

 _____________________

 

Terrorism is caused by anti-Islamic forces. Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by anti-Islam forces and  rogue agencies. Fake democracies have zero-tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices. Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than “terrorism”